Open Hiroaki-Masuzawa opened 1 year ago
Thank you for contribution.
The development team will have a meeting next week and discuss this changes. We are now careful about this PR because it breaks the backward compatibility in publishing color images. Please wait for our decision.
We had a development meeting yesterday, and we concluded that the modifications should satisfy the following table:
Published data / FORMAT in Body files | COLOR | DEPTH | COLOR_DEPTH | POINT_CLOUD | COLOR_POINT_CLOUD |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Color image | x | x | X | X | |
Depth image | x | x | |||
Point cloud | x | x | |||
Color point cloud | x | x |
Your changes to the DEPTH and COLOR_DEPTH formats are correct and now approved.
The difference between our conclusion and your proposal is whether or not we allow BodyROS to publish colour images with cameras whose formats are either POINT_CLOUD or COLOR_POINT_CLOUD. Although removing this publication is easy, it is not a good choice. The following reasons support our conclusions in the table above.
Thank you for your consideration of this PR. I have revised it in accordance with your comment.
Currently, when using the COLOR_POINT_CLOUD settings, the color images that can be retrieved are non-organized images, i.e., 1xN shape images, as well as depth images. And, when using the POINT_CLOUD settings, the color images that can be retrieved are zero pixels. Is there any way to get an organized image?
By this PR, modify publish data. The below tables are showed current and modified publish data for each camera setting.
related to #11.