Closed ssr-yuki closed 2 years ago
Each service name is currently set to
device_name/switch
. This should be discussed.
@RyodoTanaka Do you have any ideas on the name? All comments are welcome.
@ssr-yuki
Do you have any ideas on the name?
I agree with your naming.
In the Body file, on
is used.
Thus, the name <device_name>/on
would be the other selection.
But from the point of easy understanding, <device_name>/switch
is better, I think.
I am going to add clearing server procedures, as discussed in #7 . I will modify contents of this PR after # 7 is merged, since conflict resolution is required.
I have changed the service names because of discussion in Choreonoid Discource. https://discourse.choreonoid.org/t/ros/430/19
Thank you for your cooperation!
This PR provides a function discussed in Discourse.
std_srvs::SetBool
type is used.Each service name is currently set to
device_name/switch
. This should be discussed.