Open chrfrantz opened 2 years ago
If a component-level nested combination is preceded by an annotation (but without component), the entire nested combination is ignored in the output.
Example: [state]{Cac[state]{A[role=monitored,type=animate](Operations) I[act=violate](were (non-compliant [OR] violated)) Bdir[type=inanimate](organic farming provisions)} [AND] Cac[state]{A[role=enforcer,type=animate](Manager) I[act=terminate](has concluded) Bdir[type=activity](investigation)}}
[state]{Cac[state]{A[role=monitored,type=animate](Operations) I[act=violate](were (non-compliant [OR] violated)) Bdir[type=inanimate](organic farming provisions)} [AND] Cac[state]{A[role=enforcer,type=animate](Manager) I[act=terminate](has concluded) Bdir[type=activity](investigation)}}
The leading [state] will lead to matching failure --> likely in Regex.
[state]
No longer relevant, since combination syntax is Cac[annotation]{ Cac{ ... } [XOR] Cac{ ... } }. However, inheriting component combination-level annotation should be considered.
If a component-level nested combination is preceded by an annotation (but without component), the entire nested combination is ignored in the output.
Example:
[state]{Cac[state]{A[role=monitored,type=animate](Operations) I[act=violate](were (non-compliant [OR] violated)) Bdir[type=inanimate](organic farming provisions)} [AND] Cac[state]{A[role=enforcer,type=animate](Manager) I[act=terminate](has concluded) Bdir[type=activity](investigation)}}
The leading
[state]
will lead to matching failure --> likely in Regex.