Open Frank1773 opened 3 years ago
according to https://tools.ietf.org/search/rfc4492 "secp256r1" should be the same thing as "prime256v1" and the later one seems to be supported in xca. (disclaimer: I am no expert in these things) Maybe the wording in the selection box can be improved so people like me searching the term "secp256r1" in the combobox find the proper entry?
Thank you @horsth . This was driving me nuts.
When I get a chance, I'll put a pull request together to change the label to make sure that prime256 v1 is labeled as a NIST/X9.62/SECG curve, like it is for prime192v1.
is there a plan to implement secp256r1?