search

chriskoli / ospy

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/ospy
1 stars 1 forks source link

oSpy does not support spawning and monitoring applications from the start #5

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. What are activeSync processes inject vs the regular inject option?
2. Anyway to catch a program as it is starting up rather than attaching 
after it has started.
3.

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?

What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
1.8.13.0  Windows XP SP2.

Please provide any additional information below.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by host...@shaw.ca on 12 Jan 2007 at 8:49

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
1. The short answer: bad UI design. :-P  It's a shorthand for injecting into the
three processes used by ActiveSync. The history behind this is that I was REing
ActiveSync (that's how the project started), and initially the whole app being 
one
big hack (well, it still is, oSpy2 is the way forward now), I just left it in. 
:)

2. This is a feature most welcome for oSpy2. Feel free to join in on 
development, I'm
mostly alone in development these days so I tend to prioritize features that I 
need
the most myself (as my time is very limited).

Original comment by ole...@gmail.com on 3 Aug 2007 at 11:59

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Sorry, I take all of that back. :) I realized I won't have enough time to 
finish the 
rewrite, so instead I'll keep improving oSpy 1.x and gradually rewrite piece by 
piece 
as I go along.

1. Fixed in 1.10.0 which is about to be released -- making captures should be a 
lot 
more intuitive now.

2. Definitely a planned feature for 1.10.1.

Original comment by ole...@gmail.com on 20 Aug 2009 at 12:08

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by ole...@gmail.com on 20 Aug 2009 at 12:09

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
This was fixed (implemented) in 1.10.1.

Original comment by ole...@gmail.com on 25 Aug 2009 at 11:58