How does this differ from alternatives?

[patcon]

Sorry, I hate to be the guy who asks the obvious, but how is this different from vagrant-lxc or vagrant-docker, functionality-wise?

https://github.com/philspitler/vagrant-docker https://github.com/fgrehm/vagrant-lxc

[chrisroberts]

• https://github.com/chrisroberts/vagabond#local-chef-server
• https://github.com/chrisroberts/vagabond#test-kitchen
• https://github.com/chrisroberts/vagabond#infrastructure-testing
• https://github.com/chrisroberts/vagabond#spec-real-infrastructure

[patcon]

Sorry, I formulated the wrong question :) Mostly curious whether vagabond was avoiding leveraging those other projects by design (ie. they're incompatible approaches to running LXC's), or if it was simply historical reasons. (I see that the first commits were a year ago, so the latter would make sense.)

It wasn't that I didn't skim the README, but just didn't see any talk about them in the queues :)

(After going through the README more thoroughly, this is project is effing awesome.)