search

chrisss404 / check-mk-arm

Checkmk for Raspberry Pi.
182 stars 23 forks source link

Package 2.0.0p21 for buster 32 bits #49

Closed sergiodadi closed 2 years ago

sergiodadi commented 2 years ago

Hello,

using chekmk professionally, I am now retired and now use checkmk, on a Raspberry Pi 4, for my small personal network, thanks for your packages. If I understand correctly, you no longer build packages for 32-bit buster ?

So I tried to build the packages through your scripts. For information, these packages are available [ici], (https://github.com/sergiodadi/check-mk-raspberry), this may be of interest to other people.

I upgraded from checkmk 2.0.0p17 to 2.0.0p21 on 2 differents Raspberry and everything was OK.

By the way, do you plan to build packages for 64-bits bulleyes?

Thanks again for your work

Serge

chrisss404 commented 2 years ago

Hi Serge,

If I understand correctly, you no longer build packages for 32-bit buster ?

Yes, that's right.

By the way, do you plan to build packages for 64-bits bulleyes?

No, I have no plans to do that.

Let me know if you want me to link your packages in this repository's README or if you would like to release your packages in this repository.

BR Christian

herzkerl commented 2 years ago

Thanks to the both of you—I struggled installing the newest build von 64-bit (lite) Bullseye... That explains it. @chrisss404 Since 64-bit is the new standard in 'Raspberry Pi Imager'—mind putting a hint in the README.md? :)

sergiodadi commented 2 years ago

Christian,

Let me know if you want me to link your packages in this repository's README

Yes, of course, you can put a link to my GitHub. I can build the futures buster 32 bits versions .

thanks

Serge

sergiodadi commented 2 years ago

Hi Ben,

Thanks to the both of you—I struggled installing the newest build von 64-bit (lite) Bullseye...

I have quickly tried build a 64 bits Bulleyes version with Christian script, but was unsuccessful. I tried with python-make-set-aarch64-architecture.patch.

Did you succeed ? Did you modify the patch file?

Serge

martux69 commented 2 years ago

Hi, I built a 64-bit version for bullseye, you can find it under the release. It is untested! Feel free to test ;-) Regards Martin

sergiodadi commented 2 years ago

Hi, I built a 64-bit version for bullseye, you can find it under the release. It is untested! Feel free to test ;-) Regards Martin

Thanks, I quickly install on a Bulleye 64 bits test VM (Proxmox on Raspberry) and it 's seem OK 👍

lsb_release -a

uname -a Linux Host-003 5.10.0-11-arm64 #1 SMP Debian 5.10.92-2 (2022-02-28) aarch64 GNU/Linux

omd status Doing 'status' on site monit64: mkeventd: running rrdcached: running npcd: running nagios: running apache: running redis: running crontab: running Overall state: running

omd versions 2.0.0p21.cre (default)

Best regard

Serge

chrisss404 commented 2 years ago

@herzkerl

mind putting a hint in the README.md? :)

I updated the README.md, better?

@sergiodadi

Yes, of course, you can put a link to my GitHub. I can build the futures buster 32 bits versions .

I added a link to your repository.

Did you succeed ? Did you modify the patch file?

If you are still interested in the 64-bit build, this unmaintained build script might help. It worked for checkmk 2.0.0b6, see: https://github.com/chrisss404/check-mk-arm/blob/1.6.0/build_check_mk_buster64.sh

@martux69

I built a 64-bit version for bullseye

Nice!

herzkerl commented 2 years ago

@chrisss404

I updated the README.md, better?

Perfect! :)

sergiodadi commented 2 years ago

Christian,

If you are still interested in the 64-bit build, this unmaintained build script might help. It worked for checkmk 2.0.0b6, see: https://github.com/chrisss404/check-mk-arm/blob/1.6.0/build_check_mk_buster64.sh

Hello, thank you for this script that I did not know. A quick test shows that it no longer works, I will try to understand why . I think there is a problem with architecture (x86_64) somewhere...

[...] /usr/local/src/check-mk-raw-2.0.0p21.cre/omd/build/intermediate_install/Python-3.8.7/lib/python3.8/lib-dynload/zlib.cpython-38-aarch64-linux-gnu.so: new RUNPATH: /omd/versions/2.0.0p21.cre/lib

sed -i 's|--rpath,/omd/versions/[^/]*/lib|--rpath,/omd/versions/2.0.0p21.cre/lib|g' \ /usr/local/src/check-mk-raw-2.0.0p21.cre/omd/build/intermediate_install/Python-3.8.7/lib/python3.8/_sysconfigdata_linuxx86_64-linux-gnu.py

sed: can't read /usr/local/src/check-mk-raw-2.0.0p21.cre/omd/build/intermediate_install/Python-3.8.7/lib/python3.8/_sysconfigdata__linux_x86_64-linux-gnu.py: No such file or directory

make[1]: *** [packages/Python3/Python3.make:50: /usr/local/src/check-mk-raw-2.0.0p21.cre/omd/build/stamps/Python-3.8.7-cache-pkg-process] Error 2

make[1]: Leaving directory '/usr/local/src/check-mk-raw-2.0.0p21.cre/omd' make: [debian/rules:42: install] Error 2 dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build-arch subprocess returned exit status 2 debuild: fatal error at line 1182: dpkg-buildpackage --rules-target build-arch -rfakeroot -us -uc -ui -i.git -I.git -i.gitignore -I.gitignore failed make[1]: [Makefile:284: deb] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory '/usr/local/src/check-mk-raw-2.0.0p21.cre/omd' make: *** [Makefile:97: deb] Error 2 [...]

thank you

Serge