Open christerdk opened 12 years ago
Sounds interesting. I could try the camear stuff.
I've been looking around for some basic code snippets, just to get over the first hurdles, and I found this: http://snippets.dzone.com/posts/show/8683
Might be a good starting point.
Furthermore, this will be the flow on the server side:
More or less something like that...
What kind of picture host do you have in mind? flickr?
That's a possible option, but the Malmö festival web crew spoke very well about http://www.smugmug.com/ which they use for the site. They said that the api was very good...
I see the role of that site as being a CDN enabled data store, with good api and maybe a rss feed generator.
What do you think?
@FredrikL
@FredrikL Btw, Anatoly and I originally talked about splitting the work, so that he would focus on the app side, and me on the server side. Now that you've joined the team, I'll leave it to you guys to distribute the app work among you, and I'll continue to stay on the server side.
@christerdk yeah, i used that method in my tumblr app, the important thing is to use the extra_output to get the camera app to write the full resolution image somewhere. Shouldn't be that hard.. i'll familiarize myself with the code a bit more tomorrow.
@mirontoli have you started doing any work on this feature yet ?
Great. I'll slowly start out on the backend stuff, and make a feature branch in my repository. I'll probably start out with just making an void endpoint, that will respond with 200 OK but won't really do anything else for starters. Just so that you guys have something to integrate against.
It there anything about this feature that is not clear? I mean, with regards to the description in the issue and also the follow up comment about what needs to be done on the server? In such case let me know ...
After thinking this over little, I think I will try to get some more validity to this feature, and investigate if anyone has a genuine interest in using the pictures. I mean, contrary to other features we've had in this project, the idea is only good if someone actually uses the produced images, in my opinion. That is, something along the lines of integrating back to the malmo festival web site (images under artists, or something they'd like to show on big screen during pauses between events). I just think it would be a potential waste of time and creativity, if we get hindered because of unforseen obstacle (technical, political, etc.). If you agree, I'll try to get in touch with some malmo festival people...
Until then, shall we postpone this and find other areas to improve?
Any thoughts?
@christerdk sounds good
@christerdk Sounds good. @FredrikL I haven't started yet. I have very little time from monday to friday :) Next weekend I want to investigate more the issue #7.
Btw, I am very glad that you joined!
On start activity there sould be a photo icon. When clicked, the users will go through the following flow:
After selecting the event, the photo will be uploaded to an image server with the following metadata:
1 . Id of schedule.
(The idea is to show these images later on a site or even live during the festival).