Closed sugoidogo closed 1 year ago
Thanks, but I don't really get the point of the proposed changes. On Ubuntu and Debian the usage of data from etc/os-release
does not lead to different information than lsb_release -sc
(tested with Debian Server 22.04 and Mint 21).
"Debian Server 22.04" doesn't exist. That's an Ubuntu version number. Both lsb-release and /etc/os-release should contain the same codename value, which is what's required for adding the repo, but lsb-release isn't part of a standard debian install.
"Debian Server 22.04" doesn't exist. That's an Ubuntu version number.
True. Sorry, my fault. Should have been "Ubuntu Server 22.04"
Both lsb-release and /etc/os-release should contain the same codename value, which is what's required for adding the repo, but lsb-release isn't part of a standard debian install.
OK. I see your point.
change debian-based install instructions to avoid ubuntu-specific codename retrieval