Open porpoiseless opened 5 years ago
- Some field names (i.e. "Function") are reserved words in some languages. Should we use "fn" instead?
This can be handled on a language-by-language basis. While function
may be reserved in one language, fn
is the function definition keyword in some Lisps. I know that the standard way to handle conflicts with builtins in Python is to append an underscore: class
--> class_
. Anyway, any reasonable language should be ok handling reserved words in strings, as they probably would be. My Clojure program is using keywords, which are idiomatic and can handle alphanumerics and most special characters.
- Should fields like "Stem" be addressed as 0-indexed or 1-indexed arrays? Should the new "Stem 0" be at index 0 or at index 3?
I don't think "stem 0" or "degree 0" ever has its own definition like the other stems/degrees, so this shouldn't be an issue for dictionaries. For word interchange, I think a human-oriented approach should be used: if a human would say it's "degree 2", then the number 2
would be used. If a programming language uses zero-indexed arrays, then the program would have to adjust the index when fetching fetching the definition from a one-indexed lexicon.
- Some fields, like the one containing the lexical consonant cluster, lack an official singular name. Do we call this field "root" or "cr".
Here's my proposal for all the grammatical category names:
affiliation
aspect
bias
case
case_scope
configuration
context
degree
designation
effect
essence
format
(incorp_case
?)function
illocution
incorp_root
incorp_specification
incorp_stem
level
mood
perspective
phase
referent
register
root
sanction
specification
stem
type
valence
version
(I may have forgotten some.)
Names for word types: formative
, simple_formative
, complex_formative
, adjunct_1
, adjunct_2
, adjunct_3
, csvx_adjuct
, carrier_adjunct
, register_adjunct
, pronoun_adjunct
(maybe personal_reference_adjunct
instead -- but let's face it, they're basically just pronouns), case_stacking_pronoun_adjunct
, and parsing_adjunct
.
Any other ideas?
In order to encourage development of related tooling, we should establish a standard way of transmitting and inputting Ithkuil/TNIl words, e.g. to a web frontend. In particular, we should provide canonical solutions to the following problems: