In the summary table in the intro to chapter 5, Naive Bayes is marked as a non-linear model. From my superficial research his seems to be false in some important cases, though it may be true in some others. Here are some reference materials collected via search engine:
The most basic argument here is that Naive Bayes takes a product of probabilities, and this can be converted to a sum using a logarithm. Does this mean that Naive Bayes is compatible with explanation techniques for linear models? Does the logarithm interfere with this?
In the summary table in the intro to chapter 5, Naive Bayes is marked as a non-linear model. From my superficial research his seems to be false in some important cases, though it may be true in some others. Here are some reference materials collected via search engine:
The most basic argument here is that Naive Bayes takes a product of probabilities, and this can be converted to a sum using a logarithm. Does this mean that Naive Bayes is compatible with explanation techniques for linear models? Does the logarithm interfere with this?