Link to the issue .
https://github.com/chsasank/llama.lisp/issues/55
We have the instruction (set a 10), (add a b), (fmul a b). But the instruction declare is defined as (declare (a int)) . Why do we require an additional () after declare. It does not add any features and is counter intuitive. Instead I propose a change in syntax which is intuitive and simple (declare a int).
So in the directory llama.lisp/src/backend/tests/c-lisp I have made changes to the syntax of all the declare statement from (declare (a b)) to (declare a b).
In the file src/backend/c-lisp.py, I have made changes to how the declare statement is interpreted.
chsasank
commented
3 months ago
Link to the issue . https://github.com/chsasank/llama.lisp/issues/55 We have the instruction (set a 10), (add a b), (fmul a b). But the instruction declare is defined as (declare (a int)) . Why do we require an additional () after declare. It does not add any features and is counter intuitive. Instead I propose a change in syntax which is intuitive and simple (declare a int). So in the directory llama.lisp/src/backend/tests/c-lisp I have made changes to the syntax of all the declare statement from (declare (a b)) to (declare a b). In the file src/backend/c-lisp.py, I have made changes to how the declare statement is interpreted.