Unclear instruction in UG

[chuababyy]

Screenshot 2023-11-17 at 4.15.08 PM

I dont understand why the point is about "leading space is ignored" , but the examples given, in one it is /name Taylor Swift and in the other it is /name   Taylor Swift

The point and the example do not link

[nus-pe-bot]

Team's Response

We do not agree with the tester as the " " is meant to show that the command does not take the leading spaces into consideration, which is precisely what the point is meant to say.

Items for the Tester to Verify

:question: Issue response

Team chose [response.IssueUnclear]

• [x] I disagree

Reason for disagreement: To clarify:

The point in the UG is leading spaces in parameters are ignored. Im assuming by this they meant

addm /name Taylor Swift /phone 91691969 is equivalent to addm /name     Taylor Swift /phone 91691969

However, what they actually put was

addm /name Taylor Swift /phone 91691969 is equivalent to addm /name   Taylor Swift /phone 91691969

Therefore, I state that the point and the example dont match because what is &nbsp;

---