Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Taking ownership
Original comment by a.w.davi...@gmail.com
on 9 Feb 2012 at 10:31
I have the paths being shown individually (I think) at the current stage,
however I'm not sure how to name the different paths. I was thinking maybe
something generic like "Path 1, 2, ..., n" might end up working for now, and
then have the selected paths expand to show the set of traces (sorted). And
then, regarding Issue 205, these trace IDs could expand to further show the log
lines.
Also, I'm thinking I might need to write some more (and better) test code for
grabbing paths through selected partitions after this, because for larger logs
like shopping cart (unrefined) I seem to be getting quite a few null pointer
exceptions when highlighting the "check-out" and attempting to get the paths
through said node.
Original comment by a.w.davi...@gmail.com
on 11 Feb 2012 at 2:37
For now, don't worry about the label text. We won't be able to fit much
information in the label anyway, so we'll need to have some way of expanding
the information.
And yes, testing the path logic is important, especially if you're seeing
exceptions.
Original comment by bestchai
on 11 Feb 2012 at 7:29
Well, I originally thought I'd make the traces only show up when selecting a
certain path to view, but then I decided to make them visible whenever by the
user without having to view other paths (I figured it would be annoying to
remove whatever traces one might be reading over when overlaying a separate
path).
This is currently in revision b0af5306caba. If this looks good enough for now,
then I'm fairly certain it's ready for code review.
Original comment by a.w.davi...@gmail.com
on 13 Feb 2012 at 7:24
Attachments:
I've made some changes to ModelTab/JS code in default, can you merge this
cleanly into the Issue214 branch? I'll review the code in the branch once you
do this.
Original comment by bestchai
on 13 Feb 2012 at 2:28
Solution in revision 081c1349a89f. Please review.
Original comment by a.w.davi...@gmail.com
on 14 Feb 2012 at 12:33
The interface works well, I think. I left a code review in revision
b0af5306caba and in revision 185e435f5df4. Please address both of these.
Also, make sure to pull/update since I made some small changes.
Original comment by bestchai
on 14 Feb 2012 at 2:49
Solution in revision 9e6a915295da. Please review.
Original comment by a.w.davi...@gmail.com
on 15 Feb 2012 at 1:56
I left a few more code review comments on revision 9e6a915295da.
Original comment by bestchai
on 15 Feb 2012 at 6:00
Solution in revision 42244898a698 (along with a few other bits of code cleanup
for things I hadn't noticed were pointless previously).
As a side note, I've also enabled quite a number of compiler warnings in
Eclipse thanks to the info in the link.
Original comment by a.w.davi...@gmail.com
on 15 Feb 2012 at 7:05
Fixed with revision 165dde6548a9
Original comment by bestchai
on 15 Feb 2012 at 6:01
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
bestchai
on 6 Feb 2012 at 6:35Attachments: