Closed rusefillc closed 9 months ago
I have added an warning for that, and the corresponding warning-no-pins
configuration field.
If you set it to skip
, it should not generate the index.html for that yaml.
Does this solve this issue?
warning-no-pins
or error-no-pins
? what's the default value?
my challenge is I've lost track of all interactive-pinout usages so adding new argument... Well just realized that I am screwed any way since I would have to go bump version anyway.
https://github.com/rusefi/rusefi/blob/0495c9fd4c5c013690813b8606ef6bf3821a1199/.github/workflows/gen-pinouts.yaml#L23 sets the behavior for warnings: warnings: "false"
Individual warning types can override that, e.g. the next line, warning-dupe: "error"
I can PR with the warning config and point to a new release (which I haven't made yet)
I can PR with the warning config and point to a new release (which I haven't made yet)
if you are confident in the change maybe just make a release and i will report if anything break? overall how seriously do you take the whole testing/lifecycle?
There's no unit testing or anything like that. I just poke around in several rusEFI pinouts and see if I can spot anything amiss.
i have too many yaml files intending to upload all into subfolders and have .htaccess directory listing give me an index of all folders
problem: at the moment attached index.html in the root folder - it has no info in it just JS header