chuyun2024
commented
1 day ago Hi Yisu!
Thank you so much for your peer review, all of them are very helpful!!
The followings are added/changed based on feedback:
- link to the repository, which should be located in the footnotes
- abstract
- R and R packages used for the analysis cited using BibTeX
- Citation of external sources in introduction
- A discussion of how the data is measured
- Why Open Data Toronto is selected among alternatives
- extended discussion of the daily redemption count histogram and the temporal analysis of redemptions over months
- The visuals on monthly redemptions are also not located in the corresponding subsection -> fixed the location
- Some extraneous subsections, such as "Second Discussion Point" and "Weaknesses and Next Steps" are replaced by actual content.
- The references section: refereces.bib updated to include all R packages and external articles
- The irrelavent datasheet and literature folder in the repo are deleted.
- Tests for the analysis data are added in test scripts.
- model and replication scripts deleted.
- redundant dataset sketch and a graph sketch deleted in sketches folder
- Reorganizing paper to put all analysis in the data section
Opening statement summary
This paper analyzes the relationship between the sales and redemption of Toronto Islands ferry tickets, identifying a positive linear correlation between the two.
Strong positive points
The paper has excellent organization, realized through a table of contents and extensive cross referencing. The visuals are correctly labeled and creative.
Critical improvements needed
The abstract is missing, and the link to the repository, which should be located in the footnotes, is not present. R and R packages used for the analysis are not currently cited using BibTeX. In the introduction, the author provided statistics, but did not cite the external sources.
A discussion of how the data is measured, as well as why Open Data Toronto is selected among alternatives, needs to be included. A discussion of the daily redemption count histogram and the temporal analysis of redemptions over months should be extended. The visuals on monthly redemptions are also not located in the corresponding subsection. Some extraneous subsections, such as "Second Discussion Point" and "Weaknesses and Next Steps" are currently on the document.
The references section is missing, and refereces.bib needs to be updated to include all R packages and external articles used to conduct analysis and compose the research paper.
The datasheet and literature folder in the repo are irrelevant.
The testing script is missing tests for the analysis data. The preamble in the model script needs to be updated. The replications script is currently empty. There is a redundant dataset sketch and a graph sketch in the sketches folder.
Suggestions for improvement:
Please consider:
Evaluation:
R cited: 0/1 not cited using BibTeX. I am not sure if this will cause the paper to receive a score of 0 in the actual submission LLM documented: 1/1 Title: 2/2 Author, date, repo: 0/2 repo link missing Abstract: 0/4 missing Introduction: 4/4 Data: 8/10 missing dataset selection discussion Measurement: 0/4 missing Cross references: 2/2 Prose: 6/6 Graphs/tables: 4/4 Referencing: 0/4 missing references section and BibTeX citations of R packages Commits: 2/2 Sketches: 2/2 Simulation: 4/4 Tests: 3/4 missing tests for analysis data Reproducibility: 3/4 missing one preamble, the repo has some extraneous files Code style: 1/1 General excellence: 3/3 45/64
Estimated mark: 70 out of 100.
Reason:
The existing components of the paper and the repository are solid, but updates on content and references are required.