Closed Zhentao-Liu closed 9 months ago
BTW, do you know any other real CBCT scan? I really need it!
The 'cone'
geometry assumes an idealized CBCT geometry (source and detector rotate around the object in two concentric circles that lie in the same plane, the source-detector-axis goes through the center, the detector normal is pointing to the center, the horizontal and vertical detector lines are aligned with the rotation plane and rotation axis, respectively. For real experimental CBCT setups, this is not true and using the 'cone'
geometry will not work. In particular, data sets V1 and V3 have a very different geometry. Therefore, we provided the calibrated geometric description of each projection as a 'cone_vec'
geometry. (cf. the sections "Projection geometry and acquisition parameters" and "Projection Data" in the paper).
More CBCT data from our lab can be found on zenodo
Many thanks for your reply. I have solved this problem. In real-captured CBCT data, cone_vec
will be more useful.
I wanna ask for some other large scale datatsets (dozens of samples) for deep learning model training. The rests CBCT datasets on zenodo are too small (only one or two). Thanks in advance.
I don't know any such data sets from other groups. From our group, there is also this one (131 scans)
Many thanks to your help and advice!
Hello, its a great work on real CBCT data. But I have questions on the FDK reconstruction code. In your code, you use
proj_geom = astra.create_proj_geom('cone_vec', projs_rows, projs_cols, vecs)
to create projection geometry in astra toolbox. But I useproj_geom = astra.create_proj_geom('cone', detector_spacing_x, detector_spacing_y, projs_rows, projs_cols, angles, source_origin, origin_det)
and get quite different results. If I use v2 (middle source position), I could get a decent but worse result. For other two position, then it completely failed. Could you help me? My code is attached bellow. Mant thx!!!