MultiQC format needs improvement

cidgoh / bacpaq

Bacterial Genomics workflow for short(Illumina) and long-read (Oxford Nanopore) sequencing data

MIT License

5 stars 2 forks source link

MultiQC format needs improvement #63

Open anwarMZ opened 3 months ago

anwarMZ commented 3 months ago

Description of the bug

If there are two FastQC sections displaying the read stats before/after preprocessing, then why are there six samples in each FastQC diagram? I'm expecting 3 samples, as the nanopore data is not analyzed by FastQC.
The general statistics table has too many missing values making it hard to understand. Likely need to split it into multiple tables

Command used and terminal output

No response

Relevant files

No response

System information

No response

jimmyliu1326 commented 3 months ago

If there are two FastQC sections displaying the read stats before/after preprocessing, then why are there six samples in each FastQC diagram? I'm expecting 3 samples, as the nanopore data is not analyzed by FastQC.

Just realized the reason is because those correspond to forward and reverse reads..