cindyxinyiwang / deep-latent-sequence-model

Pytorch implementation of "A Probabilistic Formulation of Unsupervised Text Style Transfer" by He. et. al. at ICLR 2020
165 stars 26 forks source link

Question about obtaining language model priors #15

Open seongminp opened 3 years ago

seongminp commented 3 years ago

Hello again. Thank you for sharing your work!

I have carefully read your paper (and looked through your code), but I fail to understand how LM priors are actually calculated. (Going from lstm logits -> distribution over vocab)

It seems to be calculated in this code snippet: https://github.com/cindyxinyiwang/deep-latent-sequence-model/blob/8a798582b1af5ef7f6ac4ca1f2138fd382a1cb06/src/model.py#L339

When you obtain the gumbel logits and log_softmax them, I guess they become probability distributions of input x. What I fail to grasp is the exact format of the distribution.

For every logit dimension (hidden dim), do we get a separate distribution? Or do we get a single distribution (over all possible tokens in the vocab) for each word in sequence? If so why is there a sum function..?

I’d appreciate it greatly if you could shed some light on this.

Thank you!

jxhe commented 3 years ago

Hi,

log_p0 is a single distribution (over all possible tokens in the vocab) for each word in sequence, tgt is one-hot vectors at its last dimension, thus in:

https://github.com/cindyxinyiwang/deep-latent-sequence-model/blob/8a798582b1af5ef7f6ac4ca1f2138fd382a1cb06/src/model.py#L354

log_p0 is of shape (batch_size, seq_len, vocab_size), the first sum (sum(dim=2)) actually indexes the distribution with tgt as the index, to obtain a tensor with shape (batch_size, seq_len), which is the log likelihood of each token. The second sum (sum(dim=1)) sums all the log likelihood on the seq_len dimension, to return a tensor ll0 of shape (batch_size) which represents the log likelihood of each sentence.

seongminp commented 3 years ago

Thank you so much for the explanation!

So when training the inference network q(latent y given observed x), do you not use teacher forcing during the forward pass that obtains latent y? (Meaning there is no pre-completed decoder input and latent y is created autoregressively by the inference network).

We want inference network to generate latent y in a similar way as the lm prior, but to obtain what the lm prior has to say about latent y, we need latent y in the first place. So I was wondering non-autoregressive forward pss of the inference network was at all possible.

I did not understand what to put as the decoder input in this case. I understand that we do give the transfer direction ‘c’ to the decoder.