Open zarp-dev opened 2 years ago
Blend of Pictures and Icons looks ugly as well as confusing. imho either we should keep all icons or all pictures.
Also room icon is visible after opening the room so I don't get why we need to duplicate it in drawer.
Bump ! This is one of the few last things I prefer on Element ^^''
Also room icon is visible after opening the room so I don't get why we need to duplicate it in drawer.
Uh… Maybe because pictures are here to recognize/differentiate multiple rooms ?
Blend of Pictures and Icons looks ugly as well as confusing. imho either we should keep all icons or all pictures.
I agree but I would like this feature too, but the rooms in the proposed solution image dont look very clean to be honest. Spaces look great tho. This app has great design, which we don't want to break. Maybe all pictures (optional perhaps) would work
Also room icon is visible after opening the room so I don't get why we need to duplicate it in drawer.
What it would achieve: It gives you a birds eye view of the rooms you have. The room you're looking for catches your eye so you can click on it faster or find it faster.
Maybe all pictures (optional perhaps) would work
Yes, agreed. This could be a setting to let the user choose.
Blend of Pictures and Icons looks ugly as well as confusing.
…That's already what we have for people. Do you find Cinny ugly and confusing for that ?
I've wrote #1076 that successfully fixes this issue. It doesn't let the user choose though, maybe @kfiven would like to contribute a setting for this ?
Blend of Pictures and Icons looks ugly as well as confusing.
…That's already what we have for people. Do you find Cinny ugly and confusing for that ?
I meant a blend of icons and pictures in one list. That's why I said either we should have icons or just pictures.
Yes, i understood. In the people list, you might have their avatar or a color circle with a letter if they don't have an avatar. So we already have mixed display in Cinny.
I'll duplicate what I wrote in #1076:
Today I came to github only to fill a feature request on topic... but found this PR. I believe group avatars should be visible (isn't it their purpose?); it's so common and familiar for ~my friends~ potential users migrating from other popular messengers.
Current UI reminds channels in slack/discord spaces though — is it an actual motivation? In that case I do agree it's a nice feature, but I feel that:
it's only reasonable in spaces, not in global "home" list. Spaces do feel like slack/discord servers and UI with no room avatars could be fine for them because
But "home" space feels more like a usual "chat-oriented" (rather than "space-oriented") messenger (Telegram, WhatsApp...) — a place where divergent uncategorized chats (communities) are shuffled together. This factor makes visual distinction more valuable. I'd say rooms outside of spaces are kind of "mini spaces" themself.
I don't really want my matrix client hiding room avatars from me. And I really like Cinny, wish I could suggest it to my friends as a feature-rich alternative to messaging apps that do not respect privacy.
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
It is reasonable to make it so that if a room or space has a picture, the picture is displayed.
Describe the solution you'd like
Show a picture of the room (or space) if available, if not - show the default room (or space) icon![Screenshot 2021-09-19 at 14 57 52](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/65812041/133926775-12eecffa-8eea-44ab-8488-a2db8d9b1159.png)
If the room does not have a picture, show the default room icon in the header:![Screenshot 2021-09-19 at 23 43 54](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/65812041/133942566-391673c0-edae-4914-aa7a-32fde03bcb3d.png)