[#328] Default Safe variable is incorrect in many cases

🗣 Description

Default Safe variable is incorrect in many cases

Closes #328

💭 Motivation and context

The Default Safe variable was assigned an incorrect value in many of the baselines and this was resulting in incorrect conditional checks when there are no log events present for a given policy.

🧪 Testing

Testing may involve testing in a default setting environment (potentially new environment) where the settings/controls are unchanged and there are no log events.
Another work around to test this is to delete the logs from the 'ProviderSettingExport.json' file, that way no log events will be present and the DefaultSafe value can be tested
This update touched many of the baseline policies and corresponding unit tests, so ensure everything is working as expected

✅ Pre-approval checklist

[x] This PR has an informative and human-readable title.
[x] Changes are limited to a single goal - eschew scope creep!
[x] If applicable, All future TODOs are captured in issues, which are referenced in the PR description.
[x] The relevant issues PR resolves are linked preferably via closing keywords.
[x] All relevant type-of-change labels have been added.
[x] I have read and agree to the CONTRIBUTING.md document.
[x] These code changes follow cisagov code standards.
[x] All relevant repo and/or project documentation has been updated to reflect the changes in this PR.
[x] Tests have been added and/or modified to cover the changes in this PR.
[x] All new and existing tests pass.

✅ Pre-merge Checklist

[x] This PR has been smoke tested to ensure main is in a functional state when this PR is merged.
[ ] Squash all commits into one PR level commit using the Squash and merge button.

✅ Post-merge Checklist

[x] Delete the branch to clean up.
[x] Close issues resolved by this PR if the closing keywords did not activate.

cisagov / ScubaGoggles

[#328] Default Safe variable is incorrect in many cases #343