Put in code in header (commented out) that can activate those banners
Context for reviewers
Note: I tried making one banner and put a commented out copy variation in there, 11ty did not like that (commented out code in that content block broke the layout)
Setup
You can test this on your local by uncommenting either one of the banners in header.
Code Review Verification Steps
As the original developer, I have
Satisfied acceptance criteria and met development standards
[x] Met the acceptance criteria, or will meet them in a subsequent PR
[ ] Created/modified automated tests
[x] Added at least 2 developers as PR reviewers (only 1 will need to approve)
[x] Messaged on Slack or in standup to notify the team that a PR is ready for review
[ ] Changes to “how we do things” are documented in READMEs and or onboarding guide
[ ] If any model was updated to modify/add/delete columns, makemigrations was ran and the assoicated migrations file has been commited.
Ensured code standards are met (Original Developer)
[x] All new functions and methods are commented using plain language
[ ] Did dependency updates in Pipfile also get changed in requirements.txt?
[ ] Interactions with external systems are wrapped in try/except
[ ] Error handling exists for unusual or missing values
Validated user-facing changes (if applicable)
[ ] New pages have been added to .pa11yci file so that they will be tested with our automated accessibility testing
[ ] Checked keyboard navigability
[ ] Tested general usability, landmarks, page header structure, and links with a screen reader (such as Voiceover or ANDI)
[x] Add at least 1 designer as PR reviewer
As a code reviewer, I have
Reviewed, tested, and left feedback about the changes
[ ] Pulled this branch locally and tested it
[ ] Reviewed this code and left comments
[ ] Checked that all code is adequately covered by tests
[ ] Made it clear which comments need to be addressed before this work is merged
[ ] If any model was updated to modify/add/delete columns, makemigrations was ran and the assoicated migrations file has been commited.
Ensured code standards are met (Code reviewer)
[ ] All new functions and methods are commented using plain language
[ ] Interactions with external systems are wrapped in try/except
[ ] Error handling exists for unusual or missing values
[ ] (Rarely needed) Did dependency updates in Pipfile also get changed in requirements.txt?
Validated user-facing changes as a developer
[ ] New pages have been added to .pa11yci file so that they will be tested with our automated accessibility testing
[ ] Checked keyboard navigability
[ ] Meets all designs and user flows provided by design/product
[ ] Tested general usability, landmarks, page header structure, and links with a screen reader (such as Voiceover or ANDI)
[ ] Tested with multiple browsers, the suggestion is to use ones that the developer didn't (check off which ones were used)
[ ] Chrome
[ ] Microsoft Edge
[ ] FireFox
[ ] Safari
[ ] (Rarely needed) Tested as both an analyst and applicant user
Note: Multiple code reviewers can share the checklists above, a second reviewers should not make a duplicate checklist
As a designer reviewer, I have
Verified that the changes match the design intention
[ ] Checked that the design translated visually
[ ] Checked behavior
[ ] Checked different states (empty, one, some, error)
[ ] Checked for landmarks, page heading structure, and links
[ ] Tried to break the intended flow
Validated user-facing changes as a designer
[ ] Checked keyboard navigability
[ ] Tested general usability, landmarks, page header structure, and links with a screen reader (such as Voiceover or ANDI)
[ ] Tested with multiple browsers (check off which ones were used)
[ ] Chrome
[ ] Microsoft Edge
[ ] FireFox
[ ] Safari
[ ] (Rarely needed) Tested as both an analyst and applicant user
Ticket
Resolves #226
Changes
Context for reviewers
Note: I tried making one banner and put a commented out copy variation in there, 11ty did not like that (commented out code in that content block broke the layout)
Setup
You can test this on your local by uncommenting either one of the banners in header.
Code Review Verification Steps
As the original developer, I have
Satisfied acceptance criteria and met development standards
Ensured code standards are met (Original Developer)
Validated user-facing changes (if applicable)
As a code reviewer, I have
Reviewed, tested, and left feedback about the changes
Ensured code standards are met (Code reviewer)
Validated user-facing changes as a developer
[ ] New pages have been added to .pa11yci file so that they will be tested with our automated accessibility testing
[ ] Checked keyboard navigability
[ ] Meets all designs and user flows provided by design/product
[ ] Tested general usability, landmarks, page header structure, and links with a screen reader (such as Voiceover or ANDI)
[ ] Tested with multiple browsers, the suggestion is to use ones that the developer didn't (check off which ones were used)
[ ] (Rarely needed) Tested as both an analyst and applicant user
Note: Multiple code reviewers can share the checklists above, a second reviewers should not make a duplicate checklist
As a designer reviewer, I have
Verified that the changes match the design intention
Validated user-facing changes as a designer
[ ] Checked keyboard navigability
[ ] Tested general usability, landmarks, page header structure, and links with a screen reader (such as Voiceover or ANDI)
[ ] Tested with multiple browsers (check off which ones were used)
[ ] (Rarely needed) Tested as both an analyst and applicant user
Screenshots