DRAFT - Update links and page titles on get.gov

kristinacyin commented 1 month ago

Ticket

Resolves #786

Changes

Follows suggestions laid out in this doc

Context for reviewers

Setup

Code Review Verification Steps

As the original developer, I have

Satisfied acceptance criteria and met development standards

[ ] Met the acceptance criteria, or will meet them in a subsequent PR
[ ] Created/modified automated tests
[ ] Added at least 2 developers as PR reviewers (only 1 will need to approve)
[ ] Messaged on Slack or in standup to notify the team that a PR is ready for review
[ ] Changes to “how we do things” are documented in READMEs and or onboarding guide
[ ] If any model was updated to modify/add/delete columns, makemigrations was ran and the assoicated migrations file has been commited.

Ensured code standards are met (Original Developer)

[ ] All new functions and methods are commented using plain language
[ ] Did dependency updates in Pipfile also get changed in requirements.txt?
[ ] Interactions with external systems are wrapped in try/except
[ ] Error handling exists for unusual or missing values

Validated user-facing changes (if applicable)

[ ] New pages have been added to .pa11yci file so that they will be tested with our automated accessibility testing
[ ] Checked keyboard navigability
[ ] Tested general usability, landmarks, page header structure, and links with a screen reader (such as Voiceover or ANDI)
[ ] Add at least 1 designer as PR reviewer

As a code reviewer, I have

Reviewed, tested, and left feedback about the changes

[ ] Pulled this branch locally and tested it
[ ] Reviewed this code and left comments
[ ] Checked that all code is adequately covered by tests
[ ] Made it clear which comments need to be addressed before this work is merged
[ ] If any model was updated to modify/add/delete columns, makemigrations was ran and the assoicated migrations file has been commited.

Ensured code standards are met (Code reviewer)

[ ] All new functions and methods are commented using plain language
[ ] Interactions with external systems are wrapped in try/except
[ ] Error handling exists for unusual or missing values
[ ] (Rarely needed) Did dependency updates in Pipfile also get changed in requirements.txt?

Validated user-facing changes as a developer

[ ] New pages have been added to .pa11yci file so that they will be tested with our automated accessibility testing
[ ] Checked keyboard navigability
[ ] Meets all designs and user flows provided by design/product
[ ] Tested general usability, landmarks, page header structure, and links with a screen reader (such as Voiceover or ANDI)
[ ] Tested with multiple browsers, the suggestion is to use ones that the developer didn't (check off which ones were used)
- [ ] Chrome
- [ ] Microsoft Edge
- [ ] FireFox
- [ ] Safari
[ ] (Rarely needed) Tested as both an analyst and applicant user

Note: Multiple code reviewers can share the checklists above, a second reviewers should not make a duplicate checklist

As a designer reviewer, I have

Verified that the changes match the design intention

[ ] Checked that the design translated visually
[ ] Checked behavior
[ ] Checked different states (empty, one, some, error)
[ ] Checked for landmarks, page heading structure, and links
[ ] Tried to break the intended flow

Validated user-facing changes as a designer

[ ] Checked keyboard navigability
[ ] Tested general usability, landmarks, page header structure, and links with a screen reader (such as Voiceover or ANDI)
[ ] Tested with multiple browsers (check off which ones were used)
- [ ] Chrome
- [ ] Microsoft Edge
- [ ] FireFox
- [ ] Safari
[ ] (Rarely needed) Tested as both an analyst and applicant user

Screenshots