Issue #2320: Redirect user to either home or domain request

[dave-kennedy-ecs]

Ticket

Resolves #2320

Changes

• Modified code so that views that handle IAL1 and IAL2 users are harmonized.

Context for reviewers

Setup

Test the following workflows: 1) Attempt to access the home page with a user logged in by IAL1 but has incomplete info (no title or phone). After completing the form and clicking Save, user should have option to manage domains 2) Attempt to access the /request/ page with a user logged in by IAL1 but has incomplete info (no title or phone). After completing the form and clicking Save, user should have an additional button to return to request. 3) Attempt to access the home page with a user logged in by IAL2 (invited user) but has incomplete info (no title or phone). After completing the user-profile form and clicking Save, user should have option to manage domains 4) Attempt to access the /request/ page with a user logged in by IAL2 (invited user) but has incomplete info (no title or phone). After completing the user-profile form and clicking Save, user should have the option to return to domain request. 5) From home page, with a completed user, Add a new domain request, then click the link on the intro page to update your profile. After updating the profile, you should have an option to return to your request.

Code Review Verification Steps

As the original developer, I have

Satisfied acceptance criteria and met development standards

• [ ] Met the acceptance criteria, or will meet them in a subsequent PR
• [ ] Created/modified automated tests
• [ ] Added at least 2 developers as PR reviewers (only 1 will need to approve)
• [ ] Messaged on Slack or in standup to notify the team that a PR is ready for review
• [ ] Changes to “how we do things” are documented in READMEs and or onboarding guide
• [ ] If any model was updated to modify/add/delete columns, makemigrations was ran and the associated migrations file has been commited.

Ensured code standards are met (Original Developer)

• [ ] All new functions and methods are commented using plain language
• [ ] Did dependency updates in Pipfile also get changed in requirements.txt?
• [ ] Interactions with external systems are wrapped in try/except
• [ ] Error handling exists for unusual or missing values

Validated user-facing changes (if applicable)

• [ ] New pages have been added to .pa11yci file so that they will be tested with our automated accessibility testing
• [ ] Checked keyboard navigability
• [ ] Tested general usability, landmarks, page header structure, and links with a screen reader (such as Voiceover or ANDI)
• [ ] Add at least 1 designer as PR reviewer

As a code reviewer, I have

Reviewed, tested, and left feedback about the changes

• [ ] Pulled this branch locally and tested it
• [ ] Reviewed this code and left comments
• [ ] Checked that all code is adequately covered by tests
• [ ] Made it clear which comments need to be addressed before this work is merged
• [ ] If any model was updated to modify/add/delete columns, makemigrations was ran and the associated migrations file has been commited.

Ensured code standards are met (Code reviewer)

• [ ] All new functions and methods are commented using plain language
• [ ] Interactions with external systems are wrapped in try/except
• [ ] Error handling exists for unusual or missing values
• [ ] (Rarely needed) Did dependency updates in Pipfile also get changed in requirements.txt?

Validated user-facing changes as a developer

• [ ] New pages have been added to .pa11yci file so that they will be tested with our automated accessibility testing

• [ ] Checked keyboard navigability

• [ ] Meets all designs and user flows provided by design/product

• [ ] Tested general usability, landmarks, page header structure, and links with a screen reader (such as Voiceover or ANDI)

• [ ] Tested with multiple browsers, the suggestion is to use ones that the developer didn't (check off which ones were used)

  • [ ] Chrome
  • [ ] Microsoft Edge
  • [ ] FireFox
  • [ ] Safari

• [ ] (Rarely needed) Tested as both an analyst and applicant user

Note: Multiple code reviewers can share the checklists above, a second reviewers should not make a duplicate checklist

As a designer reviewer, I have

Verified that the changes match the design intention

• [ ] Checked that the design translated visually
• [ ] Checked behavior
• [ ] Checked different states (empty, one, some, error)
• [ ] Checked for landmarks, page heading structure, and links
• [ ] Tried to break the intended flow

Validated user-facing changes as a designer

• [ ] Checked keyboard navigability

• [ ] Tested general usability, landmarks, page header structure, and links with a screen reader (such as Voiceover or ANDI)

• [ ] Tested with multiple browsers (check off which ones were used)

  • [ ] Chrome
  • [ ] Microsoft Edge
  • [ ] FireFox
  • [ ] Safari

• [ ] (Rarely needed) Tested as both an analyst and applicant user

Screenshots

[github-actions[bot]]

🥳 Successfully deployed to developer sandbox dk.

[gabydisarli]

Hi @dave-kennedy-ecs I'll be doing your design review :)

[github-actions[bot]]

🥳 Successfully deployed to developer sandbox dk.

[github-actions[bot]]

🥳 Successfully deployed to developer sandbox dk.

[github-actions[bot]]

🥳 Successfully deployed to developer sandbox dk.