The NO_64BIT_MATH code is to support when there is no native 64bit type but since C99 is now a requirement uint64_t or equivalent should always be available. By removing NO_64BIT_MATH can reduce some of the complexity in the code.
Would be interested to hear if there are any objections to this.
The NO_64BIT_MATH code is to support when there is no native 64bit type but since C99 is now a requirement uint64_t or equivalent should always be available. By removing NO_64BIT_MATH can reduce some of the complexity in the code.
Would be interested to hear if there are any objections to this.