Tag 1.0.2 docs as stable/v1.0.2

[larsgw]

Currently the new docs are only accessible by selecting the master branch on https://docs.citationstyles.org/. The default branch is stable which still points to v1.0.1 and although previous versions (including v1.0) are available by version number (like https://docs.citationstyles.org/en/v1.0.1/specification.html), this version is not yet. I don't know exactly how the docs deployment is set up but I think at least a tag named v1.0.2 on 2ae74b2c27f31ecc68c9cfa1adb2e634cb1d626f would be nice.

Edit: before it is tagged perhaps we should replace mentions of 1.0.1 with 1.0.2.

[larsgw]

It's a bit unfortunate because I just created a mapping (and finished two different ones) using v1.0.1 still. I missed the entire release (😞) and never realized due to the docs website.

[bwiernik]

We have been waiting for a few things to be in place with the styles repo.

[bwiernik]

@adam3smith @rmzelle I'd like to get the ReadTheDocs page updated to CSL 1.0.2. Can you let me know the steps to make stable point to the 1.0.2 release on this repo and also get the section titles to refer to CSL 1.0.2 Specification instead of CSL 1.0.1 Specification?

[adam3smith]

Two things: we said (I thought?) that we'd publicly announce a switch date and then do this. I have never worked with this repo, so if @rmzelle isn't around, I'd have to read through docs, too, to figure out how this works

[bwiernik]

Okay, with the locale PR ready, I think we can announce a 1.0.2 release date. December 1?

I can figure out the repo too if you'd like

[adam3smith]

OK. @bdarcus @denismaier @rmzelle everyone on board with December 1? Could we create one master checklist issue of what needs to happen on December 1 and before? I feel like we've talked about this a bunch, but not sure if it's all in one place (certainly not in a place I know)

[bdarcus]

Note that github markdown can do checklists:

• [x] one task
• [ ] another task

[bwiernik]

The ReadTheDocs page now displays 1.0.2 as stable

[customcommander]

Congrats on the 1.0.2 release ;)

I noticed that the website still has a lot of hardcoded links to the 1.0.1 specs. Is this something that you have planned to address or will you accept a pull request?

[adam3smith]

Pull request would be great

Sent from my phone

On Sun, Dec 26, 2021, 15:43 Julien Gonzalez @.***> wrote:

Congrats on the 1.0.2 release ;)

I noticed that the website still has a lot of hardcoded links to the 1.0.1 specs. Is this something that you have planned to address or will you accept a pull request?

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/citation-style-language/documentation/issues/138#issuecomment-1001239769, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAA7PWROHNED4Q6PNUXIZKLUS55AVANCNFSM4XFXOGDQ . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

[bdarcus]

Do we have a "latest" version I'd/link we can use?

[adam3smith]

For the specs? https://docs.citationstyles.org/en/stable/specification.html

Sent from my phone

On Sun, Dec 26, 2021, 15:55 bdarcus @.***> wrote:

Do we have a "latest" version I'd/link we can use?

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/citation-style-language/documentation/issues/138#issuecomment-1001240772, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAA7PWSCFXTMZTOI2JOLNXDUS56NBANCNFSM4XFXOGDQ . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

[customcommander]

See https://github.com/citation-style-language/citation-style-language.github.io/pull/47 — Not too sure; first time I contribute to this repo.