Closed bwiernik closed 4 years ago
@adam3smith What do you think of the description of article
for preprints, working papers, etc.? I modeled it on CrossRef's description. I think there is potentially value in saying that a paper a researcher just throws onto their website is a manuscript rather than a preprint.
Looks like a great start; I'll look more closely when you turn off draft.
Thanks! Yeah, didn’t do any proofreading on these yet (wanted to get something up before @denismaier and I duplicated effort)
Thanks for starting this! I think that looks really good so far. (Also the plan, 1.0.1. first, then new item types as we go along.)
If anyone wants to add missing descriptions as line comments like @adam3smith did, that would be great.
@bdarcus Are we good to merge this? I'll document the other new item types and variable after that.
I started to write item type descriptions, including some specific special considerations where needed (cf. http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/CTAN/macros/latex/contrib/biblatex/doc/biblatex.pdf). In progress. My thought was to write a bunch of examples so that we could discuss format and style. Once we've agreed on that, we could either merge or add more to this PR (e.g., we could finish documenting all of the existing item types in 1.0.1, then add new item types in future PRs).
Closes https://github.com/citation-style-language/documentation/issues/70