Open zuphilip opened 8 years ago
definitely delete all discontinued styles. I'd suggest also deleting "wrong" ones and creating tickets for them.
I'm also in favor of deleting the bmc folder. @rmzelle ?
Yes to all suggestions. (not sure it's necessary to create tickets for all journals that moved away from BMC, though)
Okay, I will do these steps then (this is mostly a reminder for myself):
Moreover, these journals changed the publisher and we may want to deal with that further:
vancouver
nowList the 11 journals which ceased publications in renamed-styles.json (Right?)
no, we agreed on the Elsevier thread that that's not necessary for dependent styles.
We could bring it up on xbiblio-devel, but yeah, I think it's only really necessary to include styles identifiers in renamed-styles.json for journals that either changed title (it happens) or for which we changed the title/ID in our metadata.
The last one "Journal of molecular signaling" uses IMO a strange reference style:
Journal Articles:
Thus, the position of the year depends on whether the journal article has a doi or not??
Do you have seen anything similar before?
I'm pretty sure they don't mean that. I looked at a couple of examples, and they have the first style in the PDFs (so I'd go with that) and the 2nd one in the html version (of the same article). I don't understand why, but I'd just go with 1., which has the additional advantage of being pretty standard Vancouver.
Hm... The most current article from them http://www.jmolecularsignaling.com/articles/10.5334/1750-2187-11-1/galley/268/download/ is even using some slight variants (bold italics, commas, spaces) to the guidelines.
Actually, I don't want to spend more time on this at the moment and maybe they will update and clarify their rules in the future. Thus, I will left the Journal of molecular signaling without a CSL style for the moment.
I've just contacted the editors for Journal of Molecular Signaling as their author guidelines and also citation style in various publications still seems messy. Let's see if/what they answer. If not I'll put something together that seems like the common denominator between most of their publications?
HI gang, Just looking at this request here and it looks like health-research-policy-and-systems just follows the "old" biomed-central style and not one of the Springer styles: https://health-policy-systems.biomedcentral.com/submission-guidelines/preparing-your-manuscript and for an article: https://health-policy-systems.biomedcentral.com/articles
Shall I just make a dependent for that?
Independent style for Journal of Molecular Signaling
was created on 26/07/2017: https://github.com/citation-style-language/styles/pull/2841
--> MOVED from https://github.com/citation-style-language/utilities/issues/34
Okay, I checked BMC: all active BMC journals are covered with the new list except two which I will add to the extra together with Insectes Sociaux in #32. Some have different parents but it seems that the information from this Springer list is more accurate resp. up-to-date.
Should we delete the
bmc
folder or just mentioned that it is not necessary anymore?Some BMC journals ceased publications:
Other journals changed the publisher:
Unclear:
What should happen to these CSL files?