Closed mgr34 closed 6 years ago
For a long time we were buidling styles under the assumption that journal articles simply don't have/need that information in the metadata (based mainly on the Zotero data model but also all major citation styles), so almost all CSL styles are coded under that assumption.
It turns out, unfortunately, that this isn't universally true, so it'd be good to fix it, but that's a pretty significant undertaking with >1000 styles. That said, we'd happy take pull requests to fix this for individual styles.
closed via #3455
In most style manuals the
publisher
andpublisher-place
is to not be included in the reference list entry. The 17th edition of Chicago-author-date is no exception [0]. However, if those fields are included in your citation chicago-author-date.csl [1] will display it. This may not be an issue per se. I suppose I can exclude the information from the reference I am feeding into the transformation. But the upstream source contains all this information. In the long run I would like to not add an additional preprocessing step if I can avoid it.Is this a bug or should I just not store this additional information with this reference if I am choosing to use Chicago author date?
My thinking is that in the future if another CSL style might be chosen that happens to request that information it is available. Rendering this a valid bug.
Here is an example of the input I am feeding and the output I am recieving
input
output
Lancy, David F. 2007. “Accounting for Variability in Mother–Child Play.” American Anthropologist 109 (2). Berkeley, Calif: University of California Press: 273–84. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.2007.109.2.273.
[0] http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/tools_citationguide/citation-guide-2.html#cg-journal [1] https://github.com/citation-style-language/styles/blob/master/chicago-author-date.csl