Closed mirresimons closed 12 years ago
Could you elaborate a bit on what you changed in the style?
Changed it so it actually matches the style of the journal which it did not:
et al. italic in text and bibliography After 6 authors in bibliography: et. al and omit other authors corrected number of authors in citation corrected number of authors in bibliography corrected the space between initials of authors Changes the comma that was shown after last author, which is not in style of journal
That was probably it, maybe more but would be minor as well. These changes are really necessary though for the style to be useful
Cheers,
Mirre
On Jan 25, 2012, at 3:48 PM, Rintze M. Zelle wrote:
Could you elaborate a bit on what you changed in the style?
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/citation-style-language/styles/issues/82#issuecomment-3651772
this still looks quite wrong for chapters, no? Your style does:
Estevez-Abe, M., Iversen, T. & Soskice, D. 2001. Social Protection and the Formation of Skills: A Reinterpretation of the Welfare State. In P. A. Hall & D. Soskice (Eds.), Varieties of Capitalism. The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press (pp. 145-183).
JEB wants:
Dawkins, R. & Krebs, J.R. 1978. Animal signals: information or manipulation. In: Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach (J.R. Krebs & N.B. Davies, eds), pp. 282–309. Blackwell, Oxford.
True.. would be nice to fix that too indeed.
I rarely cite chapters and have focussed on journal citations without changing the original format of the script
Another thing that needs fixing is, the , before et al in the reference list when there are more than six authors
cheers
On Jan 25, 2012, at 9:11 PM, Sebastian Karcher wrote:
this still looks quite wrong for chapters, no? Your style does:
Estevez-Abe, M., Iversen, T. & Soskice, D. 2001. Social Protection and the Formation of Skills: A Reinterpretation of the Welfare State. In P. A. Hall & D. Soskice (Eds.), Varieties of Capitalism. The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press (pp. 145-183).
JEB wants:
Dawkins, R. & Krebs, J.R. 1978. Animal signals: information or manipulation. In: Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach (J.R. Krebs & N.B. Davies, eds), pp. 282–309. Blackwell, Oxford.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/citation-style-language/styles/issues/82#issuecomment-3658037
I've committed a version of the style. I cleaned it up significantly and also fixed chapters, webpages, and digital (pre-print) journal articles with doi.
Great thanks
Sent from my iPhone
On 25 Jan 2012, at 23:53, Sebastian Karcherreply@reply.github.com wrote:
I've committed a version of the style. I cleaned it up significantly and also fixed chapters, webpages, and digital (pre-print) journal articles with doi.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/citation-style-language/styles/issues/82#issuecomment-3660940
Hi
Would it be possible to fix one more issue. Your work has greatly improved it.
So in the bibliography the last author of a 6+ author papers gets et al after it. However there is a comma before et al, this is not required. I do not know how to remove this.
Do you know?
Cheers..
M
On Jan 25, 2012, at 11:53 PM, Sebastian Karcher wrote:
I've committed a version of the style. I cleaned it up significantly and also fixed chapters, webpages, and digital (pre-print) journal articles with doi.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/citation-style-language/styles/issues/82#issuecomment-3660940
that's not currently possible to fix - will be in the next version of csl (delimiter-precedes-et-al)
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 1:43 PM, mirresimons reply@reply.github.com wrote:
Hi
Would it be possible to fix one more issue. Your work has greatly improved it.
So in the bibliography the last author of a 6+ author papers gets et al after it. However there is a comma before et al, this is not required. I do not know how to remove this.
Do you know?
Cheers..
M
On Jan 25, 2012, at 11:53 PM, Sebastian Karcher wrote:
I've committed a version of the style. I cleaned it up significantly and also fixed chapters, webpages, and digital (pre-print) journal articles with doi.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/citation-style-language/styles/issues/82#issuecomment-3660940
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/citation-style-language/styles/issues/82#issuecomment-3676234
Sebastian Karcher Ph.D. Candidate Department of Political Science Northwestern University
Yes I thought it might be impossible. Thanks for your great coding work :D
cheers
M
On Jan 26, 2012, at 9:46 PM, Sebastian Karcher wrote:
that's not currently possible to fix - will be in the next version of csl (delimiter-precedes-et-al)
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 1:43 PM, mirresimons reply@reply.github.com wrote:
Hi
Would it be possible to fix one more issue. Your work has greatly improved it.
So in the bibliography the last author of a 6+ author papers gets et al after it. However there is a comma before et al, this is not required. I do not know how to remove this.
Do you know?
Cheers..
M
On Jan 25, 2012, at 11:53 PM, Sebastian Karcher wrote:
I've committed a version of the style. I cleaned it up significantly and also fixed chapters, webpages, and digital (pre-print) journal articles with doi.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/citation-style-language/styles/issues/82#issuecomment-3660940
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/citation-style-language/styles/issues/82#issuecomment-3676234
Sebastian Karcher Ph.D. Candidate Department of Political Science Northwestern University
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/citation-style-language/styles/issues/82#issuecomment-3676269
This should be added to the publisher block. I do not know my way round github enough to know where to put it in your version. To not show publisher when it is a journal paper
On Jan 26, 2012, at 9:46 PM, Sebastian Karcher wrote:
that's not currently possible to fix - will be in the next version of csl (delimiter-precedes-et-al)
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 1:43 PM, mirresimons reply@reply.github.com wrote:
Hi
Would it be possible to fix one more issue. Your work has greatly improved it.
So in the bibliography the last author of a 6+ author papers gets et al after it. However there is a comma before et al, this is not required. I do not know how to remove this.
Do you know?
Cheers..
M
On Jan 25, 2012, at 11:53 PM, Sebastian Karcher wrote:
I've committed a version of the style. I cleaned it up significantly and also fixed chapters, webpages, and digital (pre-print) journal articles with doi.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/citation-style-language/styles/issues/82#issuecomment-3660940
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/citation-style-language/styles/issues/82#issuecomment-3676234
Sebastian Karcher Ph.D. Candidate Department of Political Science Northwestern University
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/citation-style-language/styles/issues/82#issuecomment-3676269
we don't do this in any of the existing styles. Which software has publisher fields for journal and magazine articles?
I use it for papers 2, this gave me problems.
On Jan 27, 2012, at 12:50 AM, Sebastian Karcher wrote:
we don't do this in any of the existing styles. Which software has publisher fields for journal and magazine articles?
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/citation-style-language/styles/issues/82#issuecomment-3679330
@rmzelle - any thoughts on this?
@adam3smith: another reason CSL should standardize field availability for item types.
@cparnot, do you know if anybody ever requested the ability to cite "publisher" and "publisher-place" for these item types? The easiest solution might be to drop the field mapping between the fields in Papers and the CSL input, assuming that nobody relies on this.
@mirresimons could you clarify what the problem was in Papers2?
@rmzelle : The mapping in Papers2 for 'publisher-place' is indeed done for all item types. Do you mean it does not make sense to have a publisher field for a journal article?
@cparnot - Mirre's "problem" was that papers printed to publisher-place for journal articles - which shouldn't be there. This can be removed by adding the little if statement he provides above. Sounds like Papers is doing everything right here wrt to the specs. We just need to figure out how to solve this more globally.
@rmzelle - I think Papers2 may have this one right and we'll have to look into fixing the styles on the repository: Here's one of the threads that mentions (and demonstrates the need for) publisher-places for journals: http://forums.zotero.org/discussion/10837/place-field-for-periodicals/
Thanks for the summary, I wanted to make sure I understand fully and now I do. So to clarify, the mapping in Papers2 indeed does use the place for journal articles. That was not due to a user request, that was just the naive way it was done on our end. Nobody has complained about it afaik, though I may not remember properly, and @mirresimons may have in fact mentioned it to us (sorry @mirresimons if I don't remember!).
We'd be happy to honor field availability based on item types, assuming some rules can be agreed on and documented. The item types in Papers2 don't have a straightforward mapping to CSL types, but we could definitely do it based on the mapping we anyway do for the <if type...>
elements.
it was a new issue. the if function solved it though, but I guess you want papers2 to use generic csl styles or something. This would be great. I am very happy with the current style and for my next paper will work on a style again most probably
On Jan 27, 2012, at 10:48 PM, Charles Parnot wrote:
Thanks for the summary, I wanted to make sure I understand fully and now I do. So to clarify, the mapping in Papers2 indeed does use the place for journal articles. That was not due to a user request, that was just the naive way it was done on our end. Nobody has complained about it afaik, though I may not remember properly, and @mirresimons may have in fact mentioned it to us (sorry @mirresimons if I don't remember!).
We'd be happy to honor field availability based on item types, assuming some rules can be agreed on and documented. The item types in Papers2 don't have a straightforward mapping to CSL types, but we could definitely do it based on the mapping we anyway do for the
<if type...>
elements.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/citation-style-language/styles/issues/82#issuecomment-3694774
Coincidentally, I just had a user with a similar issue, but with Biochemistry. I have a commit ready for this one as well, but I am waiting on this because I need to check the style more carefully, and wanted to give time if there are objections to adding those
Ah, it seems we already have a ticket for this: https://github.com/ajlyon/zotero-bits/issues/16
@cparnot, yes, we probably need to cover this case in the styles, as we'll try to get Zotero to use and map these fields.
git://gist.github.com/1676557.git