first, thanks for the great work. This is a minor issue which i have encountered.
I have noticed that calling map_blocks between given dates/block numbers returns objects which are one block short of what is returned when calling for instance the range method with the same options. In particular it appears the map_blocks method skips the last block in the range. While this is easily amendable by adding one block to the end argument of map_blocks, it seems likely to cause confusion (or I might be confused).
Hi,
first, thanks for the great work. This is a minor issue which i have encountered.
I have noticed that calling map_blocks between given dates/block numbers returns objects which are one block short of what is returned when calling for instance the range method with the same options. In particular it appears the map_blocks method skips the last block in the range. While this is easily amendable by adding one block to the end argument of map_blocks, it seems likely to cause confusion (or I might be confused).
Reproduction Steps
System Information
Using AMI: no BlockSci version: v0.7 Blockchain: Bitcoin Parser: Disk Total memory: 128 GB