Closed rhelmer closed 3 years ago
@akohlbre sorry this PR is all strange and backward, this is the best way I know to do a review of an existing codebase :)
As I mentioned above I'm not super concerned about any of the outstanding issues in WebScience as we are addressing these upstream, but I am concerned about not being able to merge in any upstream changes. I think what's here is good enough for add-on review, but I'm not still not sure we're doing ourselves any favors by using this instead of the packaged WebScience repo.
I'm trying to set the quality bar at:
. The only concern I have right now is with the latter due to the WebScience fork :)
The Princeton team decided to merge the ws-migration
branch (moving over to use the packaged @mozilla/web-science
), so closing this review.
This is a PR for review purposes. Unfortunately, we can't merge it but it gives us a transparent place to discuss the whole repository. Any changes we decide to make should be done in separate PR(s), and this can be closed when the review is concluded.