Closed esiaero closed 3 months ago
Starting in pg_cron 1.6.3, the start times reported for jobs seems to be slightly off.
Snippet of this behavior, tested on 16.3
postgres=> SHOW cron.max_running_jobs; cron.max_running_jobs ----------------------- 1 (1 row) postgres=> SELECT * from cron.job_run_details ORDER by start_time desc LIMIT 4; jobid | runid | job_pid | database | username | command | status | return_message | start_time | end_time -------+-------+---------+----------+----------+--------------------+-----------+----------------+-------------------------------+------------------------------- 3 | 15 | 1146 | postgres | foo | SELECT pg_sleep(5) | succeeded | 1 row | 2024-07-31 01:19:04.010878+00 | 2024-07-31 01:19:10.01683+00 4 | 14 | 1037 | postgres | foo | SELECT pg_sleep(5) | succeeded | 1 row | 2024-07-31 01:19:00.000452+00 | 2024-07-31 01:19:05.008552+00 3 | 13 | 382 | postgres | foo | SELECT pg_sleep(5) | succeeded | 1 row | 2024-07-31 01:18:04.011246+00 | 2024-07-31 01:18:10.021891+00 4 | 12 | 32742 | postgres | foo | SELECT pg_sleep(5) | succeeded | 1 row | 2024-07-31 01:18:00.000994+00 | 2024-07-31 01:18:05.011994+00 (4 rows)
Despite max_running_jobs being 1, the start/end times suggests that these jobs are overlapping. I think the cause is this commit - https://github.com/citusdata/pg_cron/commit/d90843de92d5e517a23b1e17da56dc08c496c774, which changes the reported start time, but not the actual job start.
max_running_jobs
Wondering if this change in behavior was intended?
+1
Can confirm reverting d90843de92d5e517a23b1e17da56dc08c496c774 restores the original behaviour.
Thanks, pushed a revert.
Starting in pg_cron 1.6.3, the start times reported for jobs seems to be slightly off.
Snippet of this behavior, tested on 16.3
Despite
max_running_jobs
being 1, the start/end times suggests that these jobs are overlapping. I think the cause is this commit - https://github.com/citusdata/pg_cron/commit/d90843de92d5e517a23b1e17da56dc08c496c774, which changes the reported start time, but not the actual job start.Wondering if this change in behavior was intended?