Closed witte-de-with closed 9 years ago
I think the exception now will be slightly different, since before we had that assert
in there, while now we are using (at Josh's helpful suggestion) the raise_for_status()
method to do the same thing. We can adjust the exception text as necessary though.
Just checking on this one -- any changes you want me to make to the exception handling?
For whatever reason, we didn't look at this tonight. As far as I can tell, it looks fine, but I'm not sure how to test it. @JoshData: any ideas?
Thanks, @JKesMc9tqIQe9M!
Nice. This'll have the same error message as now if it doesn't work the second time?