Open ericwooley opened 8 years ago
Would that be significantly different from gittorrentd
?
@Tzrlk I think the idea is to add a gittorrentd -d
that behaves identically to gittorrentd &
but either doesn't print any logs, or saves logs somewhere special. Seems like a good idea, happy to take a patch!
@Tzrlk gittorrentd runs in the forground. daemons are usually running in the background.
It would be nice to have an option to run this in the background, you could always use & I guess, but it always feels hacky.