search

cjlee112 / spnet

selected papers network web engine
http://thinking.bioinformatics.ucla.edu/2011/07/02/open-peer-review-by-a-selected-papers-network/
GNU General Public License v2.0
40 stars 11 forks source link

Could the "Open Access Toolset Alliance" be something for the spnet project to join? #92

Open ThomasA opened 10 years ago

ThomasA commented 10 years ago

I became aware of the Open Access Toolset Alliance (http://www.oatools.org) recently and it sounds like it might be relevant for your project to join this organisation. I quote from their "About page":

The Open Access Toolset Alliance is a loose group of organizations and individuals who share several core goals. The aims and goals of the alliance are:

A. The creation of an open source toolset for open access scholarly publishing. B. The facilitation of synchronous and asynchronous discussion and collaboration. C. A locus point for the showcasing of otherwise distributed projects.

More specifically, as per the initial discussion, the group wishes:

A. to create a culture of exchange where innovations, problems and solutions can be discussed B. to ensure that the various tools under development will/can be compatible C. to keep abreast of developments that explore alternative routes.

Just let me know if I am completely out of line here?

semorrison commented 10 years ago

Sounds perhaps "too generic" to be useful at the moment.

On Sep 21, 2013, at 6:33, Thomas Arildsen notifications@github.com wrote:

I became aware of the Open Access Toolset Alliance (http://www.oatools.org) recently and it sounds like it might be relevant for your project to join this organisation. I quote from their "About page":

The Open Access Toolset Alliance is a loose group of organizations and individuals who share several core goals. The aims and goals of the alliance are:

A. The creation of an open source toolset for open access scholarly publishing. B. The facilitation of synchronous and asynchronous discussion and collaboration. C. A locus point for the showcasing of otherwise distributed projects.

More specifically, as per the initial discussion, the group wishes:

A. to create a culture of exchange where innovations, problems and solutions can be discussed B. to ensure that the various tools under development will/can be compatible C. to keep abreast of developments that explore alternative routes.

Just let me know if I am completely out of line here?

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.