Open dshield55 opened 3 years ago
I want to experiment around with changing data to base 8 or base 16, multiplying, etc, was wondering if anybody knows of a dataset that was known to be manipulated so I can tell if the fraud get's obscured or holds.
North Carolina had one in 2018
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-north-carolina/north-carolina-republican-operative-charged-in-election-fraud-scheme-idUSKCN1QG2FS
@dshield55 That's an excellent question
North Carolina had one in 2018 https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-north-carolina/north-carolina-republican-operative-charged-in-election-fraud-scheme-idUSKCN1QG2FS
Interesting but without the data how does that help discussion?
@dshield55
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/breaking-exclusive-system-glitch-also-uncovered-wisconsin-reversal-19032-votes-removes-lead-joe-biden/
https://www.fec.gov/introduction-campaign-finance/how-to-research-public-records/combined-federalstate-disclosure-and-election-directory/.
I want to experiment around with changing data to base 8 or base 16, multiplying, etc, was wondering if anybody knows of a dataset that was known to be manipulated so I can tell if the fraud get's obscured or holds.