Closed groundrace closed 9 years ago
Do you have any examples of datasets which use different licences for different parts of the data?
-1 from me too. I'm sure data users would prefer if all the datasets on a site (or all the sites) had a single license, this seems like moving in the wrong direction.
Any site is free to add an extra field to their resources that indicate a license per-resource, and change the dataset license to stay where to find that information. I was hoping to implement a complete DCAT schema on top of CKAN with the scheming extension, so thank you for pointing out this difference.
Closing issue as no response. Feel free to reopen to continue.
Our project experiences with CKAN is that quite different resources are attached to datasets in the CKAN filestore, e.g. excel-files, images, csv-files, shape-files, and so on.
Considering the creation processes of this resource files, there may apply different licenes for these files. E.g. images could have licence constraints that don't allow to change the licences to the dataset licence.
So we need per-resource licences in the CKAN core that can by managed at the user interface.
CKAN license metadata fields are bound to to the dataset while DCAT license metadata is associated to the resource so that a dataset may have multiple file each one with a different license. I believe it could be worth to align CKAN to that model