Open hughperkins opened 8 years ago
(As far as "why dont I use 2.8, 2.10, eg travis build failures for 2.8 and 2.10 on mac:
Isn't the OSX issue fixed in develop?
Apparently so https://travis-ci.org/hughperkins/cltorch/builds/118785864 . But it's not the only reason I prefer 2.4 actually. I'm not sure if the 'path of least resistance' is 2.10, or 2.4, but 2.4 in its favor:
(well, I've migrated cltorch and clnn to use clblas 2.11/develop for now https://github.com/hughperkins/cltorch/#recent-changes Will see how that goes. If I get a zillion complaints about builds/bugs/opencl 1.2 support, I might try to fix 2.4; otherwise I note that 2.11/develop does seem to:
Example test program: