Closed HavardLine closed 3 years ago
The license is the BSD-3-Clause which is similarly permissive as the MIT.
The license is the BSD-3-Clause which is similarly permissive as the MIT.
Hi MasterOdin
Yes you are of course right. See bellow for comparison to the one I found at Wikipedia.
Closing the issue now. Thanks for feedback.
Hi There
It seems to me like this is a home-made license. It may be a showstopper for new contributors. This is a suggestion of MIT. Please feel free to close the issue if you do not like it.
Are you OK with the suggestion @claird? And do you accept me asking the other Copyright-holders for approval?
Suggested license text
Copyright 2018-2021 Cameron Laird Copyright 2014, Steve Witham Copyright 2007, Ashish Kulkarni Copyright 2006-2008, Mathieu Fenniak
Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.