clarin-eric / ParlaMint

ParlaMint: Comparable Parliamentary Corpora
https://clarin-eric.github.io/ParlaMint/
50 stars 53 forks source link

Coalition relation in ES-GA #612

Closed adina-v closed 1 year ago

adina-v commented 1 year ago

Hi all, Quick question about the "coalition" relation, as it appears that when converting to .vert, we get the following message: .vert, "ERROR: no coalition info found in corpus". I have been reading the previous discussions on this issue with respect to the Spanish Parliament. In the Galician Parliament we have the same issue: one single party in government, and all others forming the opposition. We understand that the correct way to encode this situation would be something like this, then, even if the "mutual" relation is between one party and, basically, itself?

    <relation name="coalition" 
              mutual="#party.PPdeG" 
              from="2012-11-16" 
              to="2016-08-01" 
              ana="#PG.9"/>
    <relation name="opposition" 
              active="#party.AGE #party.PSdeG-PSOE #party.BNG" 
              passive="#party.PPdeG" 
              from="2012-11-16" 
              to="2016-08-01" 
              ana="#PG.9"/>

Thank you!

matyaskopp commented 1 year ago

Exactly. TEI does not allow mixing mutual and active+passive. So we have decided to use one participant relation when only a single party cooperates with the government.

adina-v commented 1 year ago

Thank you! We will modify our ListOrg accordingly.