Rename V3.1 to V4?

[TomazErjavec]

I can't get it out of my head that it would be good to have the next version named 4.0, rather than 3.1:

• there have been so many changes since 3.0 that this is not a minor revision of the data but a major one
• minor revisions are also supposed to retain backward compatibility, but this one won't as some encoding decisions have changed, and the vertical file / concordancer attributes as well, and for ParlaMint-en the CoNLL-U files
• it's kind of neat that ParlaMint I had version 1 and 2, and ParlaMint II would have 3 and 4
• last, but not least, V4 rolls of the tongue better than 3.1

I would do the work, this is more asking for confirmation or good reasons why this is stupid.

[matyaskopp]

I like the idea, also for two more reasons:

• We want to refer both to the corpus and to the schema(and requirements), so it is easier to refer to v4 to avoid conclusion. We can e.g. release a ParlaMint-UA 4.0.1 (as a standalone corpus) with more data which will clearly refer to the ParlaMint 4 schema and requirements.
• one Czechocentric reason is that then ParlaMint and ParCzech versioning will be aligned with the versions :-)

[TomazErjavec]

This has now been implemented, closing.