<affiliation role="minister" ref="#GOV"
from="2020-08-01">
<orgName xml:lang="sl">Ministrstvo za obrambo</orgName>
<orgName xml:lang="en">Ministry of Defence</orgName>
</affiliation>
Is this affiliation with government or ministry? #GOV vs Ministry of Defence
If we want to allow inline affiliation, then the full correct example of this situation should be:
<affiliation role="minister" ref="#GOV" from="2020-08-01" /> <!-- minister in government -->
<affiliation role="member" ref="#GOV" from="2020-08-01" /> <!-- member of government -->
<affiliation role="head" from="2020-08-01"> <!-- head of ministry-->
<orgName xml:lang="sl">Ministrstvo za obrambo</orgName>
<orgName xml:lang="en">Ministry of Defence</orgName>
</affiliation>
<affiliation role="member" from="2020-08-01"> <!-- member of ministry-->
<orgName xml:lang="sl">Ministrstvo za obrambo</orgName>
<orgName xml:lang="en">Ministry of Defence</orgName>
</affiliation>
But I prefer to skip inline ministry organizations and use roleName:
<affiliation role="minister" ref="#GOV" from="2020-08-01"> <!-- minister in government -->
<roleName xml:lang="sl">Minister za obrambo</roleName>
<roleName xml:lang="en">Minister of Defence</roleName>
</affiliation>
<affiliation role="member" ref="#GOV" from="2020-08-01" /> <!-- member of government -->
slightly related to #842
I think this example is wrong (BTW I thought that we disallowed this in place affiliations): https://clarin-eric.github.io/ParlaMint/#exa-affiliation-orgName
Is this affiliation with government or ministry?
#GOV
vsMinistry of Defence
If we want to allow inline affiliation, then the full correct example of this situation should be:
But I prefer to skip inline ministry organizations and use roleName:
and also make
affiliation/@ref
mandatory