WillemElbers
commented
4 years ago We have to evaluate what is required to be a fair datapoint.
From the specification:
Product Perspective
The FDP has initially two usage purposes: (i) to be used as a stand-alone web
application, where data owners give access to their datasets in a FAIR manner
and, (ii) to be integrated in larger data interoperability systems, such as the
FAIRport, providing the dataset accessibility functionality for such systems...Architecture
...
Figure 5 depicts a view of the current architecture of the FDP using Archimate's
Application layer notation. From top down, we have the Archimate's Application
Interface representing the FDP's API. This API is currently composed of two
parts, the Metadata Provider API and the FAIR Data Accessor API. The
Metadata Provider API is the public interface of the Metadata Provider Service.
Similarly, the FAIR Data Accessor API is the public interface of the FAIR Data
Accessor Service.
...It seem as if data access is part of the fair data point. This might be an issue for the VCR since it only links to the actual data sets.
https://github.com/FAIRDataTeam/FAIRDataPoint/wiki/FAIR-Data-Point-Specification