I think there can be added Bibliographic and sources section (not sure about the title :-) ) directly after 2.4. Identifiers and referencing.
TEI format allows referer very straightly to the source of data by using <bibl> element or @source attribute. These mediums should be highlighted for many reasons:
it proves that data are accurate. Everybody can follow the link and view original data (if they are publicly available - Parliament proceedings usually are)
it helps in corpus development - one can check the source
corpus creation is more reproducible - if somebody decides to create a corpus from scratch - it would be possible or at least easier
if someone creates a different corpus over the same data - the references to the source can help to link these two corpora
The section on source linking can motivate people to create a better corpus. If the links to the source data exist, there is no apparent reason not to include them!
The section should highlight that @source is possible to use everywhere <u>, <pb/>, <seg>,... or even <birth>(I can imagine the situation that the birth date of MPs is not included in official sources, so Wikipedia is used...), or famous relations among parties and government (coalitions, oppositions)
I think there can be added Bibliographic and sources section (not sure about the title :-) ) directly after 2.4. Identifiers and referencing.
TEI format allows referer very straightly to the source of data by using
<bibl>element or@sourceattribute. These mediums should be highlighted for many reasons:The section on source linking can motivate people to create a better corpus. If the links to the source data exist, there is no apparent reason not to include them! The section should highlight that
@sourceis possible to use everywhere<u>,<pb/>,<seg>,... or even<birth>(I can imagine the situation that the birth date of MPs is not included in official sources, so Wikipedia is used...), or famous relations among parties and government (coalitions, oppositions)