Closed therter closed 5 years ago
hm, I wonder which one is "correct". Whatever, let's just keep it as is now.
On Fri, 4 Oct 2019, 14:45 therter, notifications@github.com wrote:
Closed #15 https://github.com/clarity-h2020/csis-helpers-module/issues/15.
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/clarity-h2020/csis-helpers-module/issues/15?email_source=notifications&email_token=AAWTC7U7VL2EOV3JIQUT43DQM43FPA5CNFSM4I5PIPG2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFWZEXG43VMVCXMZLOORHG65DJMZUWGYLUNFXW5KTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOUAWKYEQ#event-2687282194, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAWTC7XMKDDVIJ6YEXNKPFDQM43FPANCNFSM4I5PIPGQ .
emissions_scenario
is correct. It should be used in CSSIS Helpers module, too. There it is called emission_scenario
.
The parameter emission_scenario is used instead of emissions_scenario