Closed pre-commit-ci[bot] closed 1 year ago
Patch and project coverage have no change.
Comparison is base (
fc68482
) 92.95% compared to head (a16e293
) 92.95%.
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
Why have these tests failed? This was just an update to various pre-commit hooks.
Why have these tests failed? This was just an update to various pre-commit hooks.
I checked the error for my PR and is because this message
notebooks/03_Running_the_CEC2_baseline_from_python.ipynb:cell_4:4:8: E721 do not compare types, for exact checks use >
is
/is not
, for instance checks useisinstance()
Do i changed a type(cfg) == Docstring
to isinstance(cfg, Docstring)
fixing the error
Thanks. That makes sense. So basically the flake8 update has introduced some new checks. I’ll fix this and do the merge.
On Wed, 13 Sep 2023 at 19:46, Gerardo Roa Dabike @.***> wrote:
Why have these tests failed? This was just an update to various pre-commit hooks.
I checked the error for my PR and is because this message
notebooks/03_Running_the_CEC2_baseline_from_python.ipynb:cell_4:4:8: E721 do not compare types, for exact checks use > is / is not, for instance checks use isinstance()
Do i changed a type(cfg) == Docstring to isinstance(cfg, Docstring) fixing the error
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/claritychallenge/clarity/pull/338#issuecomment-1718143524, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACO7SJA6CBPSL3W2NHQXVBLX2H5RNANCNFSM6AAAAAA27TPL7E . You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: @.***>
Thanks. That makes sense. So basically the flake8 update has introduced some new checks. I’ll fix this and do the merge. …
I did the fix and pushed it. Now the pre-commit check passed
Thanks for that.
On Thu, 14 Sept 2023 at 20:03, Gerardo Roa Dabike @.***> wrote:
Thanks. That makes sense. So basically the flake8 update has introduced some new checks. I’ll fix this and do the merge. … <#m250533183976321632> On Wed, 13 Sep 2023 at 19:46, Gerardo Roa Dabike @.> wrote: Why have these tests failed? This was just an update to various pre-commit hooks. I checked the error for my PR and is because this message notebooks/03_Running_the_CEC2_baseline_from_python.ipynb:cell_4:4:8: E721 do not compare types, for exact checks use > is / is not, for instance checks use isinstance() Do i changed a type(cfg) == Docstring to isinstance(cfg, Docstring) fixing the error — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#338 (comment) https://github.com/claritychallenge/clarity/pull/338#issuecomment-1718143524>, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACO7SJA6CBPSL3W2NHQXVBLX2H5RNANCNFSM6AAAAAA27TPL7E https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACO7SJA6CBPSL3W2NHQXVBLX2H5RNANCNFSM6AAAAAA27TPL7E . You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: @.>
I did the fix and pushed it. Now the pre-commit check passed
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/claritychallenge/clarity/pull/338#issuecomment-1719988220, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACO7SJFGMAXMN63JU6ACF5TX2NIHPANCNFSM6AAAAAA27TPL7E . You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: @.***>
-- Professor Jon Barker, Department of Computer Science, University of Sheffield +44 (0) 114 222 1824
keeping the numpy version lower than 1.25.0 "fixed" the issue. but, we still need to find what is the main problem
updates: