Closed mgsouth closed 1 week ago
BTW, Gentoo Exuberant package should very argurably add an alias for etags; the binary looks if it was invoked that way and automaticlly switches to etags mode.
TAGS are not needed for package builds. I've pushed a commit to avoid all tag creation when --reproducible-build
is present. This is should at least fix your issue.
It's actually already fixed--I just don't set either --ctags or --etags. Thx though.
Correction, no it wasn't fixed. The script just found etags rather than ctags. Ebuilds are tied to particular releases/versions, so commit to trunk won't fix this ebuild. I'm going to hack around it for now.
Did you try my latest commit. It should skip that.
No, I haven't. The ebuild grabs the 2.6.0 tarballs. I'll incorporate your change with the next release, or if I create a "bleading-edge" package that does git clones from HEAD.
If you need to you could sed the differences in your build script. You should only need to make the changes to ninja.lisp, which is two lines.
https://github.com/clasp-developers/clasp/commit/58644065021b08d0c9ad4be08b2f1ebbd6e5f26e
Describe the bug Emacs v29 ctags/etags does not accept the "
-e
" parameter. ninja.lisp adds this for the "--ctags=
" case, but not for "--etags=
". FYI only; I'm just dropping ctags from Gentoo distro script.Expected behavior Maintainers look at ticket and say "yeah, whatever."
Oh, for the compile? No abort.
Actual behavior FAILED: ../TAGS /usr/bin/ctags -e -I ../.identifiers -o ../TAGS ../src/lisp/kernel/stage/base/0-begin.lisp ../src/lisp/kernel/stage/base/1-begin.lisp ../src/lisp/kernel/lsp/prologue.lisp ../src/lisp/kernel/init.lisp ../src/lisp/kernel/cmp/runtime-info.lisp ../src/lisp/kernel/lsp/sharpmacros.lisp ../src/lisp... /usr/bin/ctags: invalid option -- 'e'
Code at issue
Context