Closed a-d-w-s closed 1 year ago
Thanks for the suggestion. Unfortunately, this library was developed specifically to make using GD easier and solve some of the quirks I've run into over the year. ImageMagick/GraphicsMagick are very different beasts with a much larger feature set (but also a steeper curve to install) and, while I agree that having a similar API for it would be very nice, I'm personally not interested in building or maintaining that.
I encourage anyone who is interested in doing this to use SimpleImage's API for inspiration. 😄
Would it be possible to implement imagick magick support into the code?
Thank you