Closed rjleveque closed 9 years ago
After some grepping, I found that spot and no others, so I think you're right.
Although it shouldn't be broken -- it should just give a deprecation warning.
My mistake -- see https://github.com/clawpack/pyclaw/pull/518. In any case, it's good that we're updating visclaw to the new names. We need to update the docs too; I'll do that. What about the other packages?
I don't think any other packages would use this.
Regarding the docs, it turns out we have no documentation on this outside of docstrings. I will add some in the future, but we're fine as far as releasing 5.3.0.
due to clawpack/pyclaw#517.
@mandli, @ketch: VisClaw broke and I haven't tested everything, but I think this is the only change needed?